Fooled again

Our DEC here is really just incredible. They
requested, out of the blue, plans for how we’d set our
boats up under a direct marketing permit to dress fish
– the issue we’ve been fighting for for going on 2
years now. This came after a fishing association
representative and our state legislator’s chief of
staff told us DEC was going to come up with a solution
to address our situation for this fishing season.

Today, we get a reply from DEC that is almost
identical to all the replies we’ve received from our
govt. to date. :

Good morning Len,
Under the current regulations your proposed activity
of purchasing and processing salmon on board your
tender vessel would be covered under the vessel
processing requirements. A direct market vessel is
only allowed to process your own harvest. The
department has been discussing with you and one other
individual possible changes to the regulations. Before
proposing these changes to the regulations, we will
need to discuss them with other stakeholders and make
a determination on the appropriateness of such action.
If the determination is to make those changes, it
would not be done in time for the upcoming salmon
season. If you want to pursue the small floating
processor permit, the department would be happy to
review any application and drawings you submit, and
work with you on ways to meet the requirements.

Best Regards,
Duane McIntire

“We’re not going to help you. You can comment on the
regulations and we’ll consider them next year.” They
sound helpful for the legislators they copy on their
emails, but in fact have been anything but.

We already “commented on their regulations” last
October, and they rejected them out of hand. No
“stakeholder” discussion as they put it in this letter
– no nothing.

The DEC division director, Kristin Ryan, went in front
of the House Fisheries Committee 2 weeks ago and told
them absolutely false information. I then had to
write each committee member and the governor and show
them what she wrote to us, and the recording of what
she said to them – it was whatever the word is for
“opposite of consistent”. Misleasding. Dishonest.
Deceptive. Pick one.

DEC’s actions mean even more of our fish will go to
China, and her administration recently touted our high
exports to China – exports that are only exporting our
labor and oversight on fish processing to China. The
fish “exported” to China are raw frozen salmon that
will be processed to a finished product and then
“exported” right back here to the US for consumption.
Rather than keep the fish here, we’re encouraging
shipping our fish there – where we have no oversight –
and having them process our fish and send it back for
us to eat.

Return of the crab

Ron and I went to the cabin on Thurs, as spring is
definitely on the way. Still below freezing at night,
but we’re in the midst of a stretch of sunny skies and
starlit nights.

We had pizza topped with Elk, sauteed mushrooms and
onions for dinner. O-MY-Garage is that a good combo.
On the way back to town, we checked the crab pot, and
were happy to see they’re back. We had over a dozen.
On crossing Stephens Passage, we saw a lone female
orca on the move. I can’t remember seeing a single
female before – only males have I seen alone.

We got home to more sun. We divided up the crab
catch, then I started handing out my share two by two
to friends. We ate a couple ourselves, and what’s not
to like about fresh crab.

Spent all day Friday changing the shocks on my truck.
I am still pulling dust and rust from the corners of
my eyes and from my nose. Not much required other
than brute force and a colorful vocabulary to change
shocks. Learned a long time ago to have the sawzall
handy and ready to cut off rusty bolts, rather than
trying too hard to back off a rusty nut. The nut wins
about 99% of the time. Putting on the $200 worth of
shocks reminded me I need new tires- badly. This is
the first set of tires I’ve actually ran bald from
new. That’s gotta mean I’m getting old.


Mark Stopha and Sara Hannan
Alaska Wild Salmon Company
Wild Salmon and Salmon Pet Treats
4455 N. Douglas Hwy
Juneau, AK 99801
907-463-3115
www.GoodSalmon.com

Friendly Audience

My quasi-partner Len and I today finally got our say
in front of a legislative committee here in Juneau.
When we presented our issue, every person in the room
thought what we faced was absurd. We got verbal
support from everyone – a big processor
representative, the United Fishermen of Alaska, the
Southeast Seiners Association, and most of the
legislators on the committee. The big question now is
will we actually see any movement forward. It was
gratifying, at least, to “have our say” for a day.


Mark Stopha and Sara Hannan
Alaska Wild Salmon Company
Wild Salmon and Salmon Pet Treats
4455 N. Douglas Hwy
Juneau, AK 99801
907-463-3115
www.GoodSalmon.com

How to Fundraise for your Union, Alaska Style

Some things you can’t make up. Last year or so, a
captain of our ferry system managed to run a ferry
full of passengers aground on a charted reef on a
calm, sunny day. This week, the union he and the
ferry crew were members of were AWARDED nearly half a
million dollars by the state because they “failed to
notice” the unions when they put on a private vessel
and crew to take over the run of the state ferry crew
that ran the boat up on the rocks! I am not kidding.
Read it here:
http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/031708/sta_258637595.shtml

Fortunately, one of our best friends represents the
union, so I’ve been harrassing him to no end. He also
represents members who work at our harbors here in
town – where we charge harbor fees 40 to 400% more
than are communities, which has led to much of our
commercial fleet leaving town. I told him he could
team up his unions to raise money for the harbor here.
The captains and ferry crew could start grounding
some of the larger vessels, and they could take the
money they’d get back from the state to fund the
harbor, and everybody wins!!??!!


Mark Stopha and Sara Hannan
Alaska Wild Salmon Company
Wild Salmon and Salmon Pet Treats
4455 N. Douglas Hwy
Juneau, AK 99801
907-463-3115
www.GoodSalmon.com

King Crab

I’ve been helping my processor offload crab. Tonight,
one of the deckhands I was helping to load the live
golden king crab into the shipping tote was telling me
stories of Bering Sea crab. How on one boat he was
on, all the captains did was smoke dope from Seattle
all the way to Dutch Harbor, and how unsafe they were.
How some fishermen make $120,000 as deck hands in a
week fishing crab. And how now, since IFQ fishing was
introduced thanks to our Senator Stevens, his boat
will catch crab for another IFQ holder, and the boat
now only gets 30% of the value of the catch – the IFQ
holder gets 70%.

Today, a very big fish pleaded guilty to corruption
here – the chief of staff for former governor
Murkowski, Jim Clarke. He is as big a republican as
they come in the state, and many who have waited for
the whales to see indictments – Senator Stevens, his
son Ben, and Rep. Don Young – may not have long to
wait. Clarke was a big surprise, and so perhaps more
are in store.

As we’ve been trying to address our issues with the
state, I feel hopeless of sorts, knowing how corrupt
our system is here, from our local government all the
way up to Congress. Do I really want to deal with
these people, or just let it go.


Mark Stopha and Sara Hannan
Alaska Wild Salmon Company
Wild Salmon and Salmon Pet Treats
4455 N. Douglas Hwy
Juneau, AK 99801
907-463-3115
www.GoodSalmon.com

Battle Roy Al: March 3, 2008

The head of my fishing partner, along with my own
melon, hurt from pounding it against the brick wall
that is the State of Alaska DEC.

We’ve sent letters to the DEC, the governor’s office,
and our legislators asking for development of
appropriate regulations for what we’d like to do –
which dress (gut and gill) salmon at sea. Current law
is an amazing mess of regulations that differ not
based on what is being done (e.g., dressing salmon),
but by what business is doing it. A fishermen who is
going to deliver his catch to a processor can dress
fish all day, as much as he wants, with no permit
whatsoever. A fishermen who wants to sell his catch
directly from his boat has another set of rules to
follow for dressing fish. If you don’t catch the
fish, but buy them from a fishermen and dress the
salmon right next to his boat, yet a third set of
regulations apply!

We’ve attempted, to no avail, to get our DEC to
address what we want to do with appropriate
regulations that will provide for sanitary cleaning
surfaces and knives, a chlorinated rinse of the fish
after dressing, and protection necessary to keep rain
or birds from the processing area.

If we were catching the fish ourselves, we could clean
the fish with sea water, put them in a chlorinated
batch rinse as a final sanitizer, then ice them. Some
sort of cover overhead would keep rain out and stop
any birds, etc. from dropping any presents. This is a
great system that I’ve used, without a permit, and our
track record of quality speaks for itself – as it does
for our partner, who does have what’s called a “direct
marketers” license. Obviously, these systems fit the
smaller sized fishing boats that process relatively
small volumes of fish (a few thousand pounds) per day.

However, for us to do EXACTLY the same thing on a
small boat, with the ONLY difference being we did not
catch the fish, our DEC maintains we must have the
equipment required for a full-blown catcher processor.
We’d need a chlorine injection system, rather than a
chlorine bath, and be required to send water samples
in monthly for testing. This, in and of itself, is
not an insurmountable requirement – but still, why
make this different for what we want to do versus what
a fishing boats does? Isn’t the point to have the
fish rinsed in clean water? We’d love to see a test
of our fish versus that from a shore-based processor
on city water to see which fish had higher bacteria
counts. DEC said the regulations for fishing boats
were different because the volume of fish processed
was lower- to which we have and continue to offer
we’ll accept a volume limit on what we can do. One or
two people on a boat can only process a few thousand
pounds of fish a day – regardless of whether they also
catch the fish or not. Particularly if you’re doing
the careful cleaning that we are.

Back to the requirements – the real stickler – and
most innapropriate requirement is we must have a fully
enlclosed, lighted room on the boat to dress the fish.
DEC indicated it’s to protect against “Dust and
Pests”. When we asked where all this dust and pests
were going to come from out on the fishing grounds
(we’re in the middle of a friggin’ rainforest – dust
and pests ain’t a big problem), DEC told us floating
processors COULD tie up to a dock, so that could be
where all this dust and these pests might get on the
fish. To which we replied – we’re fully willing to be
restricted to dressing fish out on the fishing grounds
and have no intention of tying up to any dock to
process.

After these offerings, we were told DEC believes that
“fishermen fish and processors process”, which really
is nonsensical with regard to food safety. Again, how
can 2 vessels doing exactly the same thing in the same
place at the same time need different requirements for
cleaning fish???

Finally, after the DEC official had disconnected the
conference call and we were getting ready to leave,
she remarked “what would the other processors say if
we did this?”

Finally – a reason that makes sense. They shy away
from working with us to come up with an appropriate
way to make the best fish that will be available
anywhere because of what the larger processors would
say. These are the processors who get their fish
delivered to their plants in the round – and in some
places, not even fully chilled – after the fish first
have been transferred at least once from a tender
vessel (which collects fish from several boats), and
then dress these fish (many times days after they were
caught), freeze them as whole dressed fish, and ship
them to China for “reprocessing”, i.e, filleting,
vacuum packing, etc. These fish are then shipped back
to them as processed fish and then enter the US
market.

Our fish are dressed right after they are caught,
taken to town, and then further processed (filleted
and vacuum packed) by local workers, then held here
until shipment. We essentially squeeze every dollar
out to the local economy before it goes anywhere. Why
DEC would want to restrict that for no justifiable
reason is beyond all of us.

Likely the biggest help we’re going to get is by our
own customers writing their legislators and/or our
governor, asking them to get after it and help us.
Legislation is our last hope now, since we’ve
exhausted everything we know of through the current
statues and through the governor’s office (who chose
not to help us), that this is our last effort. We’ll
see what happens. This could really lead to help alot
of areas in the state – DEC said we were not the first
one’s to come to them with this request (so
apparently, they’re used to just saying no because
they can, and not for any reason).

Sometimes, the way government works, people who you
can’t remove or can’t otherwise change have power that
seems to come from nowhere, but which you can’t
address. If they had real reasons for denying us,
that would be okay. But to deny us with no real
scientific or public health reason, is what’s must
infuriating. Their plan is public health through
restriction of who can conduct trade, rather than
working as public servants who should work with their
constituents to find appropriate solutions to make
this work.


Mark Stopha and Sara Hannan
Alaska Wild Salmon Company
Wild Salmon and Salmon Pet Treats
4455 N. Douglas Hwy
Juneau, AK 99801
907-463-3115
www.GoodSalmon.com